SOC 2
An independent CPA attestation against AICPA Trust Services Criteria. You receive a report (usually Type II over a period). Common for US B2B SaaS and enterprise vendor reviews.
Learn · Frameworks
Both prove you take security seriously. They are not the same product, auditor process, or buyer signal. Here is how to choose, and when running both is the right move.
The short answer
An independent CPA attestation against AICPA Trust Services Criteria. You receive a report (usually Type II over a period). Common for US B2B SaaS and enterprise vendor reviews.
A certification that your Information Security Management System meets ISO/IEC 27001. A certification body audits your ISMS and Annex A Statement of Applicability. Common for global and EU-facing procurement.
Access control, change management, logging, incident response, and vendor risk appear in both. Implement once, map evidence to both frameworks, and avoid two disconnected programs.
When buyers ask
Practical path
Seed SOC 2 and ISO controls, then mark SoA applicability for Annex A with rationale.
IdP, cloud, and source control feed continuous tests that support both programs.
Prospects get posture; your CPA or certification body gets scoped evidence, not a scavenger hunt.
FAQ
No. SOC 2 is an attestation report from a CPA firm. ISO 27001 is a certification from an accredited certification body.
Yes, when controls are cross-mapped. Access reviews, change tickets, and monitoring alerts often satisfy related SOC 2 and ISO requirements if lineage is clear.
Usually not if your buyers are US enterprise. Start where deals are blocked. Add ISO when global RFPs require it.
One workspace imports both frameworks, cross-maps controls, runs continuous monitoring, and supports auditor collaboration and Trust Center from the same evidence graph.